<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bluegrass Politics &#187; KY Courts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/category/state-government/ky-courts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com</link>
	<description>Covering Kentucky politics and government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:44:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Minton elected to 2nd term as chief justice</title>
		<link>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/05/17/minton-elected-to-2nd-term-as-chief-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/05/17/minton-elected-to-2nd-term-as-chief-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Brammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KY Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/?p=21725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/files//2008/11/johnminton.jpg"><img src="http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/files//2008/11/johnminton.jpg" alt="" title="johnminton" width="166" height="250" class="size-full wp-image-3331" /></a>

FRANKFORT -- Justices of the Kentucky Supreme Court have unanimously voted to elect Chief Justice <strong>John D. Minton Jr.</strong> of Bowling Green to a second term.

The four-year term begins June 27.  Minton was sworn in as Kentucky’s fifth chief justice on June 27, 2008, after being elected to the Supreme Court in 2006.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/05/17/minton-elected-to-2nd-term-as-chief-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator seeks to quietly boost court clerks&#8217; pay</title>
		<link>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/03/29/senator-seeks-to-quietly-boost-court-clerks-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/03/29/senator-seeks-to-quietly-boost-court-clerks-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Cheves</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KY Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/?p=21342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/files/2012/03/Carroll-Gibson.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-21392" title="Carroll Gibson" src="http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/files/2012/03/Carroll-Gibson-197x250.jpg" alt="" width="197" height="250" /></a>

By John Cheves
jcheves@herald-leader.com

FRANKFORT -- The Kentucky Senate has approved a mandatory pay raise for circuit court clerks, at a possible cost to taxpayers of $2 million to $3 million a year, after a Senate Republican leader quietly added the proposal to an unrelated House bill.

Under the proposed state budget agreed to early Thursday, state workers will not get a pay raise next year, and state retirees will not get a cost-of-living adjustment in their pensions.

However, Senate Majority Whip Carroll Gibson of Leitchfield -- who is a retired circuit court clerk -- on Tuesday successfully amended House Bill 234 on the Senate floor to include language raising the 120 circuit court clerks' base salaries by 2 percent to 15 percent, depending on their individual circumstances.

Gibson spent less than a minute explaining his changes on the Senate floor. He told his fellow senators that his amendments were aimed at "pretty much leveling the playing field" for court clerks, as compared to other elected county officials. None of the senators asked questions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/03/29/senator-seeks-to-quietly-boost-court-clerks-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public financing of judicial elections passes House panel</title>
		<link>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/03/14/public-financing-of-judicial-elections-passes-house-panel/</link>
		<comments>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/03/14/public-financing-of-judicial-elections-passes-house-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Musgrave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Bar Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/?p=21167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Beth Musgrave
bmusgrave@herald-leader.com 

FRANKFORT -- A bill that would create public financing for judicial campaigns cleared a key hurdle on Wednesday. The House Judiciary Committee narrowly passed House Bill 230 9-6. 

House Bill 230 would make it voluntary for judicial candidates to seek public financing. People could donate to the judicial campaign finance fund through income tax check-offs or through other donations. The Kentucky Bar Association could also collect fees from attorneys for the fund. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/03/14/public-financing-of-judicial-elections-passes-house-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill to open some family courts; tax online horse wagers passes House</title>
		<link>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/24/bill-to-open-some-family-courts-tax-online-horse-wagers-passes-house/</link>
		<comments>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/24/bill-to-open-some-family-courts-tax-online-horse-wagers-passes-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Musgrave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/?p=20703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Beth Musgrave

bmusgrave@herald-leader.com

FRANKFORT -- A measure that would allow for a pilot project to open some family courts passed the House unanimously Friday.

House Bill 239 would allow for the creation of pilot projects to open family courts, which hear child abuse, neglect and dependency cases. The pilot projects, to be started on a voluntary basis by family court judges, would run for four years and would set limits on what information can be released from the hearings. The measure passed the House Judiciary Committee earlier this week 12-0. It had no opposing votes Friday. A similar measure passed the House in 2010 but was not heard in the Senate. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/24/bill-to-open-some-family-courts-tax-online-horse-wagers-passes-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky high court blocks use of newly-drawn legislative districts</title>
		<link>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/24/supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-legislative-redistricting-case/</link>
		<comments>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/24/supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-legislative-redistricting-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Brammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KY Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/?p=20689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/files/2012/01/WEB120120RedistrictCloseUp1.jpg"><img src="http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/files/2012/01/WEB120120RedistrictCloseUp1-180x250.jpg" alt="" title="WEB120120RedistrictCloseUp" width="180" height="250" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-20203" /></a>

<strong>UPDATED AT 3 P.M.</strong>

By Jack Brammer
jbrammer@herald-leader.com

FRANKFORT — The Kentucky Supreme Court has blocked implementation of the newly drawn boundaries for state legislative districts, a move that will keep Democratic Sen. Kathy Stein’s district in Lexington.

In a two-page order issued a few hours after hearing oral arguments in the case Friday morning, the state’s highest court upheld Franklin Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd’s ruling that this year’s redistricting was unconstitutional.

“Until the General Assembly passes redistricting legislation that complies with Section 33 of the Kentucky Constitution, the terms of the injunction entered by the Franklin Circuit Court remain in place,” the court said.

That means, the court said, that district boundaries enacted in 2002 remain in place, and the filing deadline for candidates to run from those districts was Feb. 10.

The court also said that because the case was expedited, a full opinion will come later. It did not provide guidance Friday about when the General Assembly should attempt to approve new redistricting legislation that is constitutional.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/24/supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-legislative-redistricting-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill to open family courts passes key hurdle</title>
		<link>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/22/bill-to-open-family-courts-passes-key-hurdle/</link>
		<comments>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/22/bill-to-open-family-courts-passes-key-hurdle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Musgrave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KY Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/?p=20666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/files//2010/02/susan-westrom.jpg"><img src="http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/files//2010/02/susan-westrom-178x250.jpg" alt="" title="susan-westrom" width="178" height="250" class="size-medium wp-image-10572" /></a>

By Beth Musgrave
bmusgrave@herald-leader.com

FRANKFORT — A bill that would allow a pilot project to open family courts unanimously passed a House panel Wednesday and will likely pass the full House in coming days.

House Bill 239 would create at least one pilot project in seven Supreme Court districts to open family court proceedings, including abuse, neglect and dependency hearings. The pilot project would last four years and would allow the courts to determine what information in those court proceedings could be released.

A similar bill passed the House in 2010 but never made it through the Republican-controlled Senate.
Rep. Susan Westrom, D-Lexington, the primary sponsor of HB 239, told the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday that opening the courts would add another level of accountability to the child protection system. 

That system has been under fire over the past 18 months after a Franklin Circuit Court judge ordered the Cabinet for Health and Family Services to release internal child protection records when a child dies or nearly dies as a result of abuse and neglect. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/22/bill-to-open-family-courts-passes-key-hurdle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court sets oral arguments in legislative redistricting case</title>
		<link>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/17/supreme-court-sets-oral-arguments-in-legislative-redistricting-case/</link>
		<comments>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/17/supreme-court-sets-oral-arguments-in-legislative-redistricting-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Brammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KY Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/?p=20612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jack Brammer
jbrammer@herald-leader.com

FRANKFORT — The Kentucky Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on the constitutionality of the General Assembly’s redrawing of state legislative districts at 10 a.m. on Feb. 24.

In a two-page order Friday, the high court said each side will be given 15 minutes to argue its case. It also said any other relief sought by legislative leaders has been denied at this time because the court has expedited a hearing.

Parties involved in the case had to file their records with the Supreme Court by noon Friday. Briefs for the Feb. 24 hearing must be filed by noon Feb. 22.

At issue is a Feb. 7 ruling by Franklin Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd that declared Kentucky’s newly-drawn legislative districts unconstitutional. Shepherd also ordered election officials to use previous district lines in this year’s state legislative elections.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/17/supreme-court-sets-oral-arguments-in-legislative-redistricting-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court puts redistricting case on fast track</title>
		<link>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/14/supreme-court-puts-redistricting-case-on-fast-track/</link>
		<comments>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/14/supreme-court-puts-redistricting-case-on-fast-track/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Brammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KY Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/?p=20551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED AT 4:09 P.M.

By Jack Brammer
jbrammer@herald-leader.com

FRANKFORT – The Kentucky Supreme Court put on a fast track Tuesday an appeal of a Franklin Circuit Court judge’s ruling that declared Kentucky’s newly-drawn legislative districts unconstitutional.

The state’s highest court said all responses to all motions in the case must be filed with its clerk by noon Friday.

State legislative leaders are appealing Franklin Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd’s order that requires state election officials to use district lines drawn in 2002 in this year’s state legislative elections.

In the appeal that the Kentucky Court of Appeals transferred to the Supreme Court on Monday, legislative leaders argued that the districts drawn this year in House Bill 1 adhere to previous U.S. Supreme Court rulings.

The legislative map in HB 1 was challenged by House Republicans and Democratic state Sen. Kathy Stein of Lexington, whose district initially was moved from inner Lexington to northeastern Kentucky. It is back in Lexington under Shepherd’s order, which legislative leaders are appealing.

Stein’s attorney, Scott White of Lexington, filed a response Tuesday afternoon to the legislative leaders’ appeal. White argued that HB 1 should be void and is unconstitutional.

The case has created uncertainty among legislators in knowing what districts they will be running from in this year’s elections.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/14/supreme-court-puts-redistricting-case-on-fast-track/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal fight over child abuse death records continues</title>
		<link>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/06/child-death-records-legal-fight-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/06/child-death-records-legal-fight-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Musgrave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KY Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/?p=20374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Beth Musgrave
bmusgrave@herald-leader.com

FRANKFORT -- A Franklin Circuit judge expects to rule by Tuesday whether a battle over child abuse death records should stay in his court.

Franklin Circuit Court Judge Phillip Shepherd said he hoped to have a decision by Tuesday, when the state Court of Appeals is expected to hear motions in the case involving the state's two largest newspapers and the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, which oversees child protection.

Shepherd has ruled previously that child protection records are open to the public when a child dies or nearly dies from abuse or neglect. Shepherd said only limited information in those files could be kept secret -- such as social security numbers and the names of children who are injured but don't die.

The state appealed Shepherd's order to the state Court of Appeals, arguing that more information in those documents should be kept secret under exemptions in the state's Open Records Act. At the same time, the cabinet has released case files of eight children who were killed or nearly killed as a result of abuse and neglect, but with more redactions than allowed under Shepherd's previous ruling.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/02/06/child-death-records-legal-fight-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge issues restraining order in filing deadline case</title>
		<link>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/01/31/judge-issues-restraining-order-in-filing-deadline-case/</link>
		<comments>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/01/31/judge-issues-restraining-order-in-filing-deadline-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Brammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Greg Stumbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Hoover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/?p=20327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignright" title="House redistricting" src="http://media.kentucky.com/smedia/2012/01/26/22/16/SUvVL.AuSt.79.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="397" />

By Jack Brammer
jbrammer@herald-leader.com

FRANKFORT — A judge issued an order Tuesday that extended the filing deadline for state legislative candidates by at least a week as he considers a legal challenge of Kentucky’s new legislative district boundaries.

Franklin Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd, in a four-page order, said the filing deadline for state House and Senate candidates won’t come before 4:30 p.m. on Feb. 7.  It was scheduled for 4 p.m. Jan. 31.

Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes said her office will continue to accept nomination papers from candidates for state senator and representative until the new deadline.

Despite the extension, several candidates filed Tuesday for Kentucky’s General Assembly, while two longtime state lawmakers — Sen. Walter Blevins, D-Morehead, and Rep. Lonnie Napier, R-Lancaster — said they have decided not to seek re-election. Their terms will end at the end of this year.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com/2012/01/31/judge-issues-restraining-order-in-filing-deadline-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

