Beshear does not rule out possibility of appointing Williams to judicial seat

September 25, 2012 | | Comments 7

David Williams, left, and Steve Beshear

By Beth Musgrave

FRANKFORT — Gov. Steve Beshear left open the option on Tuesday of considering Senate President David Williams, a longtime political foe, for an open judicial seat in Williams’ Southern Kentucky district.

Beshear said it is still too early to say who he would appoint to the seat in Cumberland, Clinton and Monroe counties. He noted that a nominating commission would have to first recommend three people for the spot held by Circuit Judge Eddie Lovelace, who died last week after reportedly suffering a stroke.

“It is obviously premature for me to comment on any particular name,” Beshear said. “But I will consider every candidate put forward by the nominating committees.”

The Democratic governor’s comments came while answering reporters’ questions during a Capitol news conference about an unrelated topic.

Williams, a Burkesville lawyer, has not said if he would be interested in the open judicial seat. He could not be immediately reached for comment on Tuesday. When asked by The Courier-Journal last week about the possibility of seeking the judicial post, Williams said he was focused on mourning the death of Lovelace, a close personal friend.

When there is a vacancy in the lower courts, a nominating commission from that judicial district selects three candidates for the governor to consider. The governor then appoints one person from the three names to serve the unexpired term.

Beshear said no one from Williams’ camp has approached him to see if he would appoint Williams, who lost to Beshear in the 2011 gubernatorial race. The two have frequently been at political odds since Beshear was first elected in 2007.

If Williams was appointed, he would not be the first Republican senator to leave the legislature for the bench.

Earlier this year, Sen. Tom Jensen, a Republican from London, announced he would not seej re-election so that he could instead run for an open circuit court seat. Former Senate Majority Leader Dan Kelly was appointed by Beshear to the bench in 2009.

Legislators can greatly increase their pensions if they take a higher-paying executive branch or legislative branch position. A circuit court judge makes approximately $124,000 a year, more than double what most part-time legislators make.

Thanks to a 2005 change in pension rules, part-time lawmakers who take a job in the judicial branch or executive branch of state government can count their higher-paying, full-time state salaries when calculating their legislative pension benefits. That means lawmakers who leave the legislature for the bench could almost double their pension.

Williams, who has been senate president since 2000, must run for re-election as senate president in the 2013 legislative session, which begins in January. The 30-day session may be a busy one. Topics that could be tackled include legislative redistricting, an overhaul of the tax code and state pension reform.

Beshear said Tuesday that it’s too early to say if he would call a special legislative session before January to deal with some of those topics.

The tax reform commission and the pension reform group — which have been studying their respective topics for several months — will not have recommendations until November, Beshear said.

“I think it would be premature to speculate on whether we will have a special session or not,” he said.

Filed Under: David WilliamsKY General AssemblyState GovernmentSteve Beshear

About the Author:

RSSComments (7)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. Jonathan says:

    This is typical Williams wanting smaller government except to want multiple retirements: (1) from the Senate, (1) from the Judiciary. Do as I say not as I do.

    This is absolutely despicable and Williams does not understand the word SERVICE at all.

    Although, his illogical way of thinking will work perfectly with the judiciary although it would be interesting to see how these two dysfuncational thinkers would work together given their past and contentious history.

  2. Buck Feshear says:

    I will be greatly disappointed in Williams if he accepts an appointment for this vacant judicial position. I would not fault him if he decided to leave his Senate seat and run for the position when the term comes back up for election, but he shouldn’t give Beshear the satisfaction of allowing the governor to eliminate his biggest political foe.

    Charlie Borders and Dan Kelly should rot forever for their acquiescence to Beshear’s plot to give the Senate back to the Democrats.

    The Senate and Williams are all that have stood between the Commonwealth of Kentucky and some very bad legislation for the past several years. Thank goodness we have the Senate to keep the Democrats from completely screwing Kentucky.

  3. It had been a fantastic supply of information. I appreciate you taking the time to publish this.

  4. Sue L. says:

    Williams has been the issue with progress within the state given his self-serving style of leadership. All Williams plays are right from the McConnell book on how to become rich in government service while “saying” you are protecting the people.

    This is all because he doesn’t have dad-in-laws money to back another campaign. Williams would sell his own children if it meant he could gain from the process.

  5. Buck Feshear says:

    Dear Sue L.:

    Would YOU want to live in a state where the Democrats could run roughshod over Kentucky if they had control of the Governor’s Office, the Senate and the House?

    I did for four decades and it wasn’t a very pleasant thing. I shudder to think what Patton & Richards and Beshear & Stumbo would have done to this state if not for the Republicans controlling the Senate.

    I thank God every day that the GOP has the Senate in Kentucky and the House in Washington. Praise be to Jesus that there’s someone who can at least slow down the things that Beshear and Obama want to do to this state and nation.

  6. Sue L. says:

    Balanced government is always a plus but Williams and McConnell are the primary issue that have slowed progress and resulted in tactics primarily designed to stop anything or benefit them personally instead of the state they represent.

    When your primary backing, financially, is from outside the state or from an extremely small number of contributors you are not focusing on progress you are focusing on the issues of the rich, be it business or individuals; these two are merely puppets and provide little balance.

  7. Buck Feshear says:

    Nothing that Obama has proposed constitutes “progess.”