RSS

GOP agenda moving through state Senate in whirlwind fashion

January 06, 2011 | | Comments 7
State Sen. Damon Thayer, R-Georgetown

State Sen. Damon Thayer, R-Georgetown

By John Cheves and Jack Brammer – jcheves@herald-leader.com

FRANKFORT — In whirlwind fashion, Senate Republicans pushed much of their 2011 legislative agenda forward Thursday in committee and floor votes with little meaningful resistance from the Democratic minority.

Among the measures approved in committee was a complex switch of the state pension plan to a defined-contribution system, similar to 401(k) accounts common in the private sector, for future state workers. The bill was approved by the Senate State and Local Government Committee without a required financial analysis.

Committee chairman Damon Thayer, R-Georgetown, said the analysis is expected in a few weeks but Republicans deemed it necessary to act on the bill this week.

Sen. Walter Blevins Jr., D-Morehead, objected to the pension measure, Senate Bill 2, noting that a 66-page substitute version of the bill was introduced just minutes before the committee vote.

“I don’t know why we have to rush this bill through,” he said.

Some Democrats have said the rush of bills in the Senate in this first week of the 2011 General Assembly is calculated to benefit Senate President David Williams’ campaign for governor. But Williams and Senate GOP leaders said similar measures have been introduced in previous legislative sessions and should be familiar to lawmakers.

The first week of legislative sessions in odd-numbered years, which last for 30 working days, historically has been set aside for electing legislative leaders and not considering bills.

The full Senate is expected to vote Friday on the pension bill and many other measures that won committee approval Thursday. They then would go to the Democratic-controlled House, which could not address them until lawmakers return to Frankfort Feb. 1.

The pension bill would make state workers responsible for saving enough for their retirements. It would not affect current state employees, only future hires, and not school teachers, who have their own retirement system.

The Kentucky Retirement Systems faces more than $30 billion in unfunded liabilities, Thayer said.

“Kentucky can no longer afford to offer its current richer pension system to future employees,” he said.

Under the bill, the state would match future employees’ retirement contributions up to 5 percent of pay for non-hazardous duty workers and up to 8 percent for hazardous duty workers.

The bill also would kill a controversial law that lets longtime legislators sweeten their public pensions by taking a job elsewhere in state government before retirement, Thayer said.

Thayer’s committee also approved three others bills without any Democratic members present. Also approved were:

■ SB 4, named the “Public Officials Accountability Act of 2011.”

Among other things, it prohibits a lawmaker or a candidate for the General Assembly from accepting a campaign contribution from lobbyists, changes the date of primary elections from May to August and requires candidates running for statewide office to file campaign finance reports electronically if their contributions total $25,000.

■ SB 7, which requires more government financial data to be available online.

■ SB 10, which would amend the Kentucky Constitution to say no law could force Kentuckians to participate in health insurance systems, provide abortion services or surrender their firearms. It also would ban laws that prevent posting the Ten Commandments and coal mining.

Earlier Thursday, the full Senate approved a bill that would require pregnant women to have a face-to-face-meeting with a doctor or designated health professional at least 24 hours before they could get an abortion.

The Senate voted 32-5 to pass SB 9. The bill has passed the Senate before but not the Democratic-led House.

Five Democratic senators voted against the bill, including Sen. Kathy Stein of Lexington. Stein tried unsuccessfully to attach an amendment that would have outlawed abortion in Kentucky, which she said was the true aim of the bill’s supporters.

The bill, which the Senate Veterans, Military Affairs and Public Protection Committee approved earlier Thursday on a 9-3 vote, also requires that the doctor who is to perform the abortion, or a certified technician, also perform an ultrasound on the woman and show it to her.

A doctor who violated the law would be fined up to $250,000.

In speaking against the bill, Dr. Connie White, a Frankfort obstetrician-gynecologist, said a patient could avert her eyes from an ultrasound but the doctor still would have to describe to her the image.

Derek Selznick, reproductive freedom project director for the state American Civil Liberties Union, said the bill would harm poor women in rural areas who must travel to get an abortion.

Sen. Katie Stine, R-Southgate, disputed that and said the bill is designed to treat each woman as an individual and give them the opportunity to ask doctors questions.

The Senate also approved three other bills and sent them to the House for its consideration. They were:

■ SB 12, which allows a school superintendent to select a principal after consulting the school-based council.

■ SB 13, which provides financial incentives to advanced science and math teachers whose students score high on advanced placement exams.

■ SB 8, which consolidates business filings and fee payments at one center in the secretary of state’s office.

Filed Under: Damon ThayerDavid WilliamsKY General Assembly

About the Author:

RSSComments (7)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. Justin Case says:

    David Williams obviously hates state employees, because the retirement bill he proposed is murderous. He doesn’t think state employees should have better benefits than taxpayers. If that is the case, then cut the legislators’ pay and benefits. After all if you represent the people – then why should you have anything better. Any unemployed citizen would love to have in a week what David Williams makes in a day.

    And if the benefits in the public sector are no better than the private sector, then start paying the state employees the same as the private sector! You can’t have it both ways.

  2. Paul Kelley says:

    If public sector employees want a pay cut then they can take the same pay as the private sector. Public sector employees make 40% more in pay and perks than the private sector, plus they dont work as hard. They cant get fired unless they committ double murder.

  3. Mike Mansfield says:

    State employees, in general, do not make more than those in private industry doing the same kinds of things.

  4. Justin Case says:

    @Paul Kelley, Mike Mansfield is correct, the merit state employees do not earn near as much as similarly situated private sector employees. Every study shows this. I am not talking about Governor appointees, who knows what they make.

    If state employees made 40% more than the private sector then everyone would work in state government. Instead, the pay is low, the benefits used to be good (but that is slowly eroding) and the general public wants to always take cheap (uninformed) shots at state workers.

  5. Stateboy says:

    So a “required financial analysis” was just ignored because “Republicans deemed it necessary to move on it this week”? A 66-page rewrite and it had to be voted out of committee today? I guess the logic that prevailed on SB5 which, in part, outlined 24/48 hour advance periods for review of appropriations/revenue bills just didn’t apply here. Guess advance notice and the ability to read that upon which you’ve already agreed to vote “yea” is relative.

  6. RESP Canada says:

    RESP Canada…

    Nice blog on GOP agenda moving through state Senate in whirlwind fashion … It is very informative but I don’t fully agree with it as I have read other online views on the same. It was good to spend evening going through internet on Monday . I’ll vi…

  7. commercial insurance quote…

    Interesting blog on GOP agenda moving through state Senate in whirlwind fashion … It is very informative but I don’t fully agree with it as I have read other online views on the same. It was good to spend evening going through internet on Sunday . I…