Legislative leaders: Expanded gambling dead, tax overhaul unlikely
By Ryan Alessi and Jack Brammer – ralessi@herald-leader.com
FRANKFORT — Legislative leaders declared dead on Friday any bills to allow expanded gambling and said it would be “difficult” to approve a tax code overhaul, fueling uncertainty about how lawmakers will approach the $1.5 billion two-year budget deficit.
One possible solution could be to delay the most painful budget decisions — raising taxes, voting on expanded gambling or making massive cuts — until next January, well after lawmakers face re-election in November.
In the meantime, lawmakers could cobble together a budget that largely preserves funding for the next fiscal year, which begins July 1, but includes placeholder numbers for the following year that rely on iffy federal stimulus money or some other windfall of revenue, said Rep. Harry Moberly, D-Richmond and a former House budget chairman.
“Something like that might be a possibility,” Moberly said. “That would postpone the most difficult decision until next January.”
The political winds could change by then, potentially giving gambling measures or a tax overhaul new life.
For now, House Speaker Greg Stumbo, D-Prestonsburg, and Senate President David Williams, R-Burkesville, said in their weekly joint news conference that there is no political will to pass a gambling bill in the 2010 General Assembly.
The declaration quashes Gov. Steve Beshear’s proposal to allow slot machines at racetracks to generate $780 million in new revenue over the biennium. Beshear predicated his $18.4 billion budget proposal on having that extra money, which enabled him to call for only slight cuts to state programs and agencies.
“It’s dead,” Stumbo said of Beshear’s proposal.
“I concur,” added Williams.
Several other gambling measures have been floated this session, including a constitutional amendment to allow slot machines, which would require approval of voters.
That bill’s sponsor, Republican state Sen. Damon Thayer of Georgetown, said it’s too early to count his proposal out.
“I don’t think anybody’s closed the door on a constitutional amendment to let the people decide,” Thayer said. He said he still plans to bring the bill up in his State and Local Government Committee, where he said he has the votes to pass it.
Williams, however, said there is no sentiment in his chamber to pass expanded gambling. The House, last year, approved a bill to allow video lottery terminals at the tracks, but the measure died in the Senate budget committee.
“I really don’t see a scenario where those bills will become an issue in this session,” Stumbo said. “Nothing has changed in the Senate, so why would the House want to act again?”
Representatives from the horse industry, including Churchill Downs and Keeneland, issued statements Friday saying they’re not giving up hope.
“No amount of political rhetoric is going to change the facts. Kentucky’s signature industry faces significant threats and challenges,” said Jay Blanton, Keeneland’s spokesman. “Our state does as well. Those challenges aren’t going away. We aren’t either.”
Sensing the slim chances for revenue from slot machines, several key lawmakers turned their attention this month to crafting a major reshuffling of the tax code.
Those three lawmakers — Moberly, Republican Bill Farmer of Lexington and Democrat Jim Wayne of Louisville — say they hope to present a plan to their colleagues next week.
But Stumbo and House budget committee Chairman Rick Rand, D-Bedford, both said Friday that passing a tax overhaul this session would be “difficult.”
Farmer said he also doesn’t expect a tax plan to pass this session. In fact, he said it would be better for the General Assembly to approve the budget first and potentially come back in a special session or next January to deal with a tax bill.
While Farmer said he would prefer a tax bill that doesn’t raise some taxes more than it cuts others, Wayne and Moberly said they want the bill to generate new revenue to help fill the budget hole, at least for fiscal year 2012.
One major component of the proposal would generate $572 million by applying the 6 percent sales tax to services that currently aren’t taxed, such as real estate agents, accountants, photographers, business call centers and repair services. It would yield another $383.5 million by repealing some sales tax breaks, such as exemptions for buying historical sites or machinery for new businesses.
However, the new revenue would be at least partially offset by cutting the income tax on businesses and middle class residents, as well as eliminating income taxes for the working poor, Wayne said.
“We have a very regressive system, so we’re trying to make it more progressive and we’re trying to make it more elastic, which means that as the economy grows … we want our tax system to reflect that,” he said.
While that proposal might provide long-term help for the state’s coffers, legislators still face tough decisions as they re-crafting the state budget for fiscal years 2011 and 2012.
House budget committee leaders will begin presenting the remaining limited options to rank-and-file members next week, Rand said.
“The governor chose not to make any tough choices, in my opinion, in his budget proposal” by assuming $780 million in gambling revenue, Rand said. “The thing he didn’t put on the table were the cuts that have to be made and what adjustments must be made there. He’s forcing us to make those choices.”
Rand also expressed skepticism about Beshear’s suggestion to free up $412 million in lottery proceeds to use for state programs instead of scholarships. The scholarships and financial aid would be covered by selling 20-year state bonds as part of Beshear’s “alternative financing” recommendation.
“I’m not too excited about that,” he said. “It’s not good business to bond for two years scholarships that we have to pay for over 20 years.”
Beshear issued a statement saying that legislators “have every right to create a different budget than the one I presented.”
But he said they’ve chosen to limit themselves to balancing the budget with undesirable choices: “making draconian cuts that will cripple our state’s services and lead to massive layoffs, significantly raising taxes on businesses and working families, or wishing and hoping for a new federal stimulus package.”
Filed Under: David Williams • Greg Stumbo • KY General Assembly • State Budget • State Government • Steve Beshear




How about bringing it up as a way to help eliminate the state income tax? If it were presented as a bridge to lower taxes elsewhere and not a means to spend as usual, I bet it would get done.
A solution to the problem of revenue could be solved by eliminating the income tax and increasing the sales tax and adding more services that must pay the sales tax. This is fair because people who spend more would pay more tax. Fair.
[...] From the Lexington Herald-Leader: Stumbo and Williams were asked at their regular Friday morning news conference if a budget based on gambling is dead for this legislative session. [...]
Sales taxes benefit only the wealthy who purchase goods & servicxes outside the state and have them delivered. Sales taxes are regressive; ask any educated economist, not some pupit appointed purveyor of poo.
The sales tax is too regressive as is. Some tweaking is to be expected. Adding \’net applied items to the taxable table of items would work. Make the income tax more progressive, starting with a lower rate applied to lower levels of income and a few more brackets at the top to encourage expansion of the work force by permitting domestic employees wages to be (at least partially) an offsetting credit against total tax liability.
More domestics is not a great answer, but its better than what the republicans want … all the poor people and horsey-set and their stable lads to leave the state. Then we\’ll be the only state without the need for medicaide or food stamps. Poor people always drag down the median values upon which the republicans make decisions. We will have a government that relies upon creationism, 11 commandments and fundamentalism.
Williams & Thayer win!!!!!!!
we pull the plug on all corporate welfare including all subsidies. Conservatives will pull their hair out crying and whining because they will lose their base meanwhile liberal progressives can say they cut spending, something conservatives cry everyday about. Let the conservatives defend spending as usual.
Fact is I just like to make conservatives cry and whine.
But it would cut spending in the budget and save money.
[...] Click here for the entire article by the Lexington Herald-Leader’s blog [...]
the governor is moving poor Kentucky to a welfare state. He should learn from other states if he dosn’t understand.
Unbelievable! The idea is to come up with tax plan on services to help balance the budget. However, Stumbo is on record as saying they probably won’t have time this session because they have to totally re-write the budget. WHAT? You just finished day 13 of 60. You have plenty of time. Legislators are already clamoring for a special session. Greed, Greed, Greed.
Get to work and do something!
Attractive section of content….
I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I don’t know who you are but certainly you’re going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already….