Senate approves bill to curb legislative retirement benefits
Track the progress of key legislation on Kentucky.com’s new legislature page.
FRANKFORT — A politically-divided Senate approved a proposal Wednesday to cancel a costly benefit that allows state lawmakers to pad their legislative pensions by taking full-time state jobs.
The controversial retirement perk was wielded as a political weapon in recent months by Gov. Steve Beshear as he tried to gain control of the state Senate from Republicans.
Before approving the bill in a 21-17 vote, Democrats and Republican argued vehemently about whether the proposed change has any real effect on current lawmakers.
The bill’s sponsor, newly-elected Republican state Sen. Jimmy Higdon of Lebanon, said the measure affects all lawmakers who retire in the future, but Senate Democrats said the proposal only impacts future lawmakers.
Senate Minority Leader Ed Worley, D-Richmond, called the measure “a feel-good political bill” with no immediate impact.
Senate Bill 51 now goes to the House for its consideration. House Speaker Greg Stumbo, D-Prestonsburg, said he believed the measure will likely pass the House. “It stands a fairly good chance …” he said.
The bill would cancel a 2005 provision that allows annual retirement benefits to increase up to sixfold for part-time lawmakers who accept appointments to a judicial or executive branch job.
The 2005 change specifically altered the legislative pension program so lawmakers who become judges or take positions in the executive branch will get a pension benefit based on their highest three years of salaries in state government — not just their wages as part-time lawmakers.
A recently released actuarial report for the Kentucky Legislators Retirement Plan said the cost of providing pensions for state legislators will jump from $759,158 in the current budget to $4.28 million during the next two years. Almost half of the $4.28 million will be used to pay for the 2005 provision.
Higdon was adamant that his proposed change would affect all future retirees. He told the Senate State and Local Government Committee, which approved the measure earlier Wednesday on a 7-5 partisan vote, that it would be unfair to change the benefits of those legislators who are already drawing benefits from the 2005 law.
Still, Sen. Julian Carroll, D-Frankfort, said in a floor speech that Higdon’s bill “would not apply to any member of this General Assembly in their future retirement.”
“What the bill would do would prevent any legislator who is elected after this bill becomes law in July from getting those benefits,” he said.
Carroll also said Higdon’s bill would limit governors from taking advantage of the experience of legislators in making appointments.
Senate President David Williams disagreed, adding that Higdon’s bill is needed because the governor has “abused” the 2005 provision.
Last year, Republican Sens. Charlie Borders of Grayson and Dan Kelly of Springfield resigned after accepting appointments by Beshear.
The Democrats captured Borders’ district seat but the Republicans kept Kelly’s, giving the GOP a 20-17 majority in the Senate, with one independent who generally sides with Republicans.
Democratic Sen. Robin Webb of Grayson, who replaced Borders, said considers Higdon’s bill “retribution” for her actions.
“Some people might think this is about politics, but it is not,” Higdon said. “It is about doing the right thing.”
–Jack Brammer and Janet Patton
Filed Under: Dan Kelly • KY General Assembly • Steve Beshear



What is not to like about this bill?
Robin Webb has become such a disappointment. I don’t think there is a conservative bone left in her body. She does whatever the Gambling Gov. and the casino industry tell her to. Although I guess she does owe them big for the hundreds of thousands of dollars the gambling industry plowed into her campaign for state senate. Let’s hope the citizens of her senate district elect someone with character and conservative values like Jack Ditty in November.
Agreed, what’s not to like? Democrats?
They will just hide this in with another bill. Wait and see. These politicians are slick and cannot be trusted. Julian Carroll voted against this bill. His part of the State should call him on this. They are wasting precious time in Frankfort and have not done much yet……
We’ve got to save money somewhere. I don’t have these benefits and I’ve worked all of my life. Vote out the ones who voted against this bill.
21-17? whats up with the 17. all a politician wants to do is line the pocket.
Watch how this one turns out. The only way things will change is when John Q Public pulls the tablecloth.wake up folks!
These elected officials should not draw a pension at all. Go to the Legislative website and look at the current bills in the senate and it is appalling what they did the first few days. Actually all the resolutions and simple resolutions are downright hilarious. Adjouring in this one’s honor and that one’s honor and on and on. Get to work people as we elected you to do or go home and stop wasting our money at a cost of over sixty thousand dollars a day.
Why would anyone vote no on this bill and seek election.?
My question is, why does it only pertain to future elected legislators? Why not apply it to the ones that are already there?
Because they are putting it to us the taxpayer. They are bleeding Kentucky dry.
Carroll, what a waste.
If they did something about the pay of the current legislators that would have been something. Pick on the old guys who have no power. Posturing & posing.
What I will be following for a list of some ofhottest video game machines in casinos at this very moment
The real travesty is that the legistlature voted to fully fund its (and the executive branch’s) pension, while STEALING the contributions due to the pensions of State of Kentucky employees. They used the employees’ money to fund their pet projects for their districts.