Higdon proposes repeal of costly legislative retirement perk
By Jack Brammer and Beth Musgrave - jbrammer@herald-leader.com
FRANKFORT — A newly elected Republican state Senator wants to cancel a costly, four-year-old benefit in the retirement system for state lawmakers that has been wielded recently by Gov. Steve Beshear as a political weapon.
Sen. Jimmy Higdon, R-Lebanon, filed legislation last week that would cancel a 2005 provision that allows annual retirement benefits to increase dramatically for former lawmakers who switch to a judicial or executive branch job.
Higdon said no one is elected to the legislature with the expectation of receiving a plum retirement. The private sector is cutting back on such perks and so should the legislature, he said.
“It’s a benefit that we clearly can no longer afford,” Higdon said.
The two legislative committee chairmen who oversee state government issues also said last week that they support changing the benefit during the 2010 General Assembly that begins Jan. 5.
Lawmakers first approved the provision, which can increase six-fold the annual retirement benefits of affected lawmakers, during the waning hours of their 2005 law-making session.
It specifically altered the legislative pension program so that lawmakers who become judges or take a position in the executive branch will get a pension benefit based on their highest three years of salaries in state government — not just as a lawmaker.
At the time, Donna Early, executive director of the system that manages both the judicial and legislative pension programs, could not say how much the provision would cost the state. But she accurately predicted that the cost would increase over time.
A recently released actuarial report for the Kentucky Legislators Retirement Plan said the cost of providing pensions for state legislators will jump from $759,158 in the current budget to $4.28 million over the next two years.
Almost half of the $4.28 million will be used to pay for the 2005 provision. That spike is due in part to so many legislators over the past two years opting to take jobs in the executive and judicial branch.
The issue has gotten more attention this year because Beshear, a Democrat, appointed two Republican senators to jobs with high salaries that will dramatically increase their pensions.
Beshear was hoping to chip away at Republican control of the Senate. He was successful in one race but not the other.
Consequently, the legislative pension of Sen. Charlie Borders, R-Russell, will jump by at least $37,500 a year if he works at least three years in his $117,000-a-year appointment to the Public Service Commission.
The pension of former Senate Majority Leader Dan Kelly, R-Springfield, who was appointed to a circuit judgeship, will also increase dramatically. Kelly will make $124,620 a year as a circuit court judge. As a legislator, he made about $50,000.
In a special election in early December to replace Kelly, the issue of the retirement perk became a campaign issue.
Higdon, a former state representative, won the race to replace Kelly. Higdon said he campaigned on the promise to file a bill that repealed the provision.
Higdon’s bill eliminates the enhanced benefit for anyone elected to the legislature after November 2010, but Higdon said he plans to amend the bill to scrub the entire program.
Meanwhile, Senate State and Local Government Chairman Damon Thayer, R-Georgetown, said he, too, is working on a bill that “generally speaking would close the loophole that allowed the governor to attempt to subvert the usual electoral process and take over the state Senate.”
He said the current provision is “very costly” and “we should make a serious attempt to close the gap.”
In the Democratic-led House, State Government Committee Chairman Mike Cherry, D-Princeton, said the pension benefit will receive scrutiny.
Cherry voted against the original provision in 2005.
“I think there is a good chance of some action repealing some of that legislation,” Cherry said. “I would want to see what Sen. Higdon’s legislation says first. But I am discussing this issue with leadership and other members of my caucus.”









Mikey | Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
This is a great idea. Too bad the pigs on both sides of the aisle will kill it off.
daniel | Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
I talked with another legislator that will add other amendments to this bill to almost scrap the entire pension for legislators. It will make major changes in the health care plan presented for legislators and other state employees.
Excellent | Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
Simply said, EXCELLENT!!!
Start putting your money where your mouths are instead of all OUR money in your pockets.
angela walker | Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
Who wants to bet this won’t happen?
handiman | Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
Better idea.
TERM LIMITS! Eight and OUT!
I have to agree | Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
This sounds too good to be true. I almost never agree with any conservative lately on fiscal matters. They spent like drunk sailors in a brothel the past eight years. I’ll wait to see the language but lawmakers and legislators shouldn’t feel comfortable or look at them working for us (their job)as something they “retire” from.
It could backfire and make the job only accessible to rich and wealthy folk.
Not a good idea at all.
watermark | Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
Higdon is showing some real leadership. We’ll see how many other leaders there are in the legislature when the details of the final bill are revealed.
What is the position of governor whatshisname on this?
kudos | Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
Kudos to Higdon, Thayer, Cherry and another other legislator who is serious about repealing the retirement perk.
FYI to Jack and Beth; Charlie Borders has lived in Grayson for at least the last 10 years. You guys must be using a 1999 LRC legislators list.
Term Limits | Dec 21, 2009 | Reply
Term limits and elimination of bribes to “legislative” causes.
The rest of us aren’t allowed to have a separate fund apart from our salary for doing business so why should “elected officials”.
We need leaders not politicians.
citizen | Dec 21, 2009 | Reply
You know this sounds great, but will it happen, I think anymore politicians get into government because they have no skill in other areas with the thought of a good pension and this is the number one thought is to line their pockets because government it seems power and money are the draw and government makes this easy to happen. lets go two terms in government period and out like it was designed with at the begining.
L Rhodes | Dec 21, 2009 | Reply
First, it is absolutely ridiculous that legislatures get a retirement for what they ROUTINELY call a part-time job.
And the fact that they can then take “part-time” work and apply it to “full-time” retirement is absolutely ridiculous.
This type of ill-logical approach doesn’t even work for our citizen warriors who are National Guard and Reservist.
If we want to call this even remotely fair, they should have to purchase that “full-time” retirement just like the rest of us.
As usual our elected representatives are putting money in their own pockets at our expense.