Feds launch civil rights probe of Kentucky’s Medicaid program
By Beth Musgrave – bmusgrave@herald-leader.com
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has launched a civil rights investigation into Kentucky’s Medicaid program after a Lexington man’s services were cut earlier this year, according to documents provided to the Herald-Leader.
Creasa Reed, the mother of James Reed, who is autistic, bipolar and mentally handicapped, filed the complaint in April after Medicaid cut her son’s budget for in-home services, leaving the 60-year-old disabled mother and her 65-year-old husband to provide more hands-on care for James Reed.
The Reeds were providing 48 hours of care in their Lexington home for their 31-year-old son. Because of the cuts to services, the Reeds now have to provide 88 hours of care.
Without the additional help, the Reeds say they may have to put James Reed in an institution.
“The last two places he was at, the state shut them down because there were so many problems,” Creasa Reed said. “He is at eminent risk of out of home placement.”
According to a June 12 letter that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights sent the Reeds, the office will be investigating whether state Medicaid officials acted appropriately when they cut James Reed’s services without considering that Creasa Reed has a disability and may not be able to provide 88 hours of care.
Creasa Reed has a debilitating medical condition called fibromyalgia which she has received Social Security disability benefits for since 2003.
Michael Robinson, a spokesman with the Department of Health and Human Services in Washington D.C., said the office would neither “confirm or deny” the civil rights investigation.
If Kentucky’s Medicaid program is found in violation of civil rights statutes, the office will seek corrections. If the state does not comply, the matter could be turned over to the Department of Justice or the Department of Health and Human Services could terminate federal funding to the state.
It is unclear how long the investigation could take. If the Office of Civil Rights sides with the Reeds, their funding could also be restored, Creasa Reed said.
Cabinet for Health and Family Services officials said Friday that they have not been notified of the civil rights investigation and could not comment on a specific case.
Marsha Hockensmith, executive director of Kentucky Protection and Advocacy, a state agency that advocates for the disabled, said a civil rights investigation is rare.
The Reeds adopted Jim when he was three-years-old through the state’s special needs adoption program. He has had over 15 hospitalizations and has been physically and sexually abused in previous institutional placements, the Reeds say.
Under a new Medicaid program launched in 2007, called consumer-directed-option, the Reeds have been able to provide care for James Reed in their home.
“We loved it,” Creasa Reed said. “We thanked God for it. We were finally able to take care of Jim at home.”
That care includes staff to be with James during the day and at night, as well as other programming.
Earlier this year, the Reeds were notified that Medicaid was going to reduce their annual budget for services from about $99,000 to $63,000. The Reeds appealed the decision through the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, but their appeal was denied. The Reeds then filed a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights in April.
The Reeds argue that the law is on their side. Under a 1999 United States Supreme Court case, commonly referred to as the Olmstead decision, the unnecessary institution of individuals with disabilities constitutes discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Although $100,000 for services may sound like a lot, the Reeds say, it can cost much more to house a person in some of the state’s institutions for the mentally disabled. Some can cost more than $1,000 a day.
The Reeds are not alone in their struggle to find additional dollars to keep their adult child at home.
Ruth and Billy Brown are in their 70s and care for their 26-year-old son Zenos, who has Downs Syndrome.
Zenos goes to a day-treatment program during the day. But the Browns, both of whom have suffered a stroke and are disabled, say they have tried without success to get more services to help them take of their son when he is at home.
“I have been blessed with nine wonderful children,” said Ruth Brown. “But even they can only do so much.”
Hockensmith, with Kentucky Protection and Advocacy, said it’s impossible to tell how many disabled parents are caring for their children statewide.
Filed Under: Federal Government • Social Services • State Government



My neighbor is also dependant upon home health care due to his being a paralyzed person since 16 or 17 years of age. We’ve talked a lot about what it would mean if his Home Health help is cut, he has family that also comes the days they are there and when they aren’t! It would make his life and many others like him end up in homes that would end up costing the government much more, as well as hurt him physcologically to feel his independence taken away from him. May God help you find solutions to these problems and short falls.
The state not only violates recipients rights, but providers as well!
I am a Medicaid provider in KY and it’s a sad mess. The State has just about bankrupted and put my agency out of business. We provide wonderful supports to those we serve with MR/DD. However, the State “creates” unbelievable ways to recoup our hard earned reimbursements. Thus…the state makes cuts by recouping from providers. As a result, KY is going to slowly loose many GOOD providers. And guess where the clients will end up? Back in institutions! So sad really. I can leave the business and chalk it up to failure, move on, and survive. But…what happens to the lives of those I currently serve? It doesn’t work out as well for them. But the state couldn’t care less!
This Is The Best Blogs…
I think this is one of the most important information for me. And i am glad reading your article. But wanna remark on some general things, The site style is perfect, the articles is really great….
Being a bridesmaid is an honor and a responsibility. Bridesmaids support the bride emotionally, help with wedding planning tasks of all sorts, and can bear a significant financial burden. While you want your maid of honor and bridesmaids to look beautiful at the wedding, you also want to keep their monetary obligation to a minimum. Finding less-expensive bridesmaids’ dresses can make things easier on your friends and family. Learn where to shop for dresses that are pretty, wearable and affordable.