Comments on: Gay rights groups protest adoption bill

By: http://www.minterest.com/benefits-of-outsourcing-difficult-web-development-projects/

Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:16:45 +0000

You have chek this website out….

Hey I discovered this web site to be actually fascinating! Bookmarked!…

By: Cheap Jordans

Cheap Jordans — Sat, 02 Apr 2011 17:37:19 +0000

soccer is my favorite,so is David Beckham

By: Cyber Crime

Cyber Crime — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 02:31:49 +0000

You’re a very skilled blogger….

I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I have shared your site in my social networks!…

By: Brian

Brian — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:19:09 +0000

Come on Kentuckians……everyone has known a gay couple that has provided a good home for unwanted children for many years? In every Kentucky town or hollow.

By: Brian

Brian — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:06:27 +0000

Come on Kentucky…every town has had a gay family r

By: May Dey

May Dey — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:40:04 +0000

When is Gary Tapp going to get over having been raised by gay wolverines? They did the best they could.

By: Michelle Nicholson

Michelle Nicholson — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:30:07 +0000

Senator Tapp:

How could you possibly propose a bill such as SB 68 during this economic crisis? Do you not grasp that ANY family is better than no family at all? Do you have absolutely no clue how many children are without a family in Kentucky? You’re supposed to be a conservative, right? So BE conservative!!! Understand that children without families are a Kentucky STATE expense. Fifty percent of the girls who “graduate” from the foster care system without a family will have a child within 16 months–and you can figure that almost every new child will be a Kentucky STATE expense. Do you want to reduce “entitlement” program members? Then find a way to make adoption an option for more children! Don’t put up barriers that don’t need to exist! The Republicans are supposed to be the CONSERVATIVE party. That means we stay the heck out of other people’s business. If a person qualifies to be an adoptive parent, then the person qualifies. The state is bringing government into our homes (which you all claim is a democrat thing, even though it’s the Republicans who insist on this) when you start making judgement calls like this. What’s next? You can only adopt if you’re a church member, a certain age demographic, or wealthy? Well guess what? There aren’t enough wealthy, young whatever religion you think is best out There aren’t enough wealthy, young whatever religion you think is best out there to adopt all the kids who are waiting for real homes.

When did the democratic party become the fiscally conservative one?