Comments on: Bill putting political robo messages on No Call list passes panel

By: Debt Settlement

Debt Settlement — Sat, 07 May 2011 13:55:25 +0000

Debt Settlement…

[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]…

By: Donde Publicar Articulos de Texto

Donde Publicar Articulos de Texto — Wed, 04 May 2011 11:10:10 +0000

Articulos Originales sobre medioambiente…

Directorio de Articulos…

By: Cyber Crime

Cyber Crime — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 03:09:18 +0000

You’re a very skilled blogger….

I’ve joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I’ve shared your site in my social networks!…

By: Jim Anderson Stivers

Jim Anderson Stivers — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:48:07 +0000

What do you mean . . . .” have to pay for the NO CALL LIST?

How is that possible under NO CALL?

By: Just A Phone Owner

Just A Phone Owner — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:20:28 +0000

While they’re at it, they could ban all calls on behalf of political candidates, charities, and allow an op-out of the “existing customer” exemption. I get more telemarketing calls now than 5 years ago, and they’re all “exempt”.

By: UK MBA

UK MBA — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:46:52 +0000

who cares

By: Alan Roberts

Alan Roberts — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:34:56 +0000

Finally! Also, if two lawmakers are concerned that Higdon’s bill might make campaigns expensive if they have to pay for the No Call list, then add a provision in the bill to make the list free to campaigns. No means no. No calls, that is…